Roberto Carballes Baena vs Franco Agamenone Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W W W L L
Form
W L W L W W L L W LHead-To-Head: Baena 2 - 0 Agamenone
They have played 5 sets in total, with Baena winning 4 and Agamenone winning 1. The last match between Baena and Agamenone was at the Perugia Challenger, 06-06-2022, First, Clay with Roberto Carballes Baena getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Roberto Carballes Baena | 2 |
| Franco Agamenone | 0 |
Perugia Challenger(06-06-2022)
6
4
3
6
6
4
| Baena | Stats | Agamenone |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (9-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 58% (11-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 56 | Ranking | 426 |
| 49 | Highest Rank | 108 |
| 32 | Age | 32 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 24 | Titles | 14 |
| 59% (584-412) | Career Total W/L | 58% (406-299) |
| $3,119,525 | Career Prize Money | $36,150 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Giron VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Noskova VS Swiatek PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Franco Agamenone
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
61 of
86)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 3-0 ret. |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Franco Agamenone
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 25 | Games Won | 20 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 2:0:9 | Average Match Time | 2:0:9 |
| 60% (79/132) | 1st Serve % | 65% (90/138) |
| 71% (56/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (54/90) |
| 57% (30/53) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (21/48) |
| 57% (8/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (6/12) |
| 46% (63/138) | Return Points Win % | 35% (46/132) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Roberto Carballes Baena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Nuno Borges
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Otto Virtanen
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Taha Baadi
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
68%
(
69 of
101)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
14
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Christopher O'Connell
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
74 of
113)
7
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
113)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
74
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Holger Rune
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariano Navone
Player
Roberto Carballes Baena
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Franco Agamenone Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Franco Agamenone
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Denis Yevseyev
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dino Prizmic
Player
Franco Agamenone
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
0
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Franco Agamenone
43%
(
26 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Martin Klizan
59%
(
65 of
111)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
39 of
96)
104
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Paul Jubb
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
32 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrej Martin
Player
Franco Agamenone
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Dusan Obradovic
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Franco Agamenone
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
4
Aces
12
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
42 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
14 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
18 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Andrej Martin
65%
(
75 of
115)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
110)
9
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
65%
(
26 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
36 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
110)
118
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (584/412) | Win/Loss | 58% (406/299) |
| 56% (1335/1031) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (908/719) |
| 53% (11702/10445) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7881/7111) |
| 39% (44/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 59% (34/24) |
| 62% (507/305) | Clay Win/Loss | 58% (367/263) |
| 53% (26/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (5/8) |
| 30% (7/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1837 | Aces Total | 829 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 2019 | Total Double Faults | 1465 |
| 1:26:7 | Average Match Time | 1:18:35 |
| 463.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 417.06 |
| 63% (35514/56132) | 1st Serve % | 68% (23357/34590) |
| 67% (23704/35514) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (14868/23357) |
| 51% (10418/20614) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (5299/11232) |
| 44% (2593/5886) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1881/3994) |
| 41% (23106/56468) | Return Points Win % | 44% (15313/35002) |
| 37% (22/37) | Slam W/L | 25% (4/12) |
| 41% (26/38) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (128/125) | Main Tour W/L | 56% (5/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (254/156) | Challenger W/L | 51% (119/116) |
| 74% (153/55) | Futures W/L | 63% (277/166) |
| 59% (549/928) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (402/699) |
| 39% (19/49) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 48% (139/287) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (77/149) |
| 52% (167/324) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (118/217) |
| 83% (592/492) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (411/349) |
| 17% (592/99) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (411/61) |
| 22% (403/87) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (294/55) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
